The new world
A new world is a seductive idea for many. We all have dreams
and ambitions. Things change in every aspect of life. Changes are not always
progressive. Traversing the United States in the 1800s was certainly difficult.
The internet is our new frontier. Training exists in the real world not online.
Science is supposed to have real world applications also. Modern training in
this new world is “peer reviewed” at best. This is not science. Keep it simple
and make progress.
![]() |
Fight the power selectively. |
A new world makes many believe they can re-write the rules.
The wheel has been invented and cannot be improved upon following this new
world path. Technology makes communicating easier world-wide. The point is, if
one’s science is faulty communication does not matter. Some profit on the hard
labor of the class of people who actually carry out the work. One does work
with the hands. Force multiplied by distance is work (F x D = W). Re-defining
terms seems the norm in our new world. Most terms do not need to be re-defined.
The core is a perfect example. The new term is in no way superior to the one
which still does the job quite well (the mid-section). The trainers who spend
the entire day online took ownership by re-naming something and stealing
all the research done decades earlier by superior scientists, coaches, and
athletes. All they did to take all the credit was rename something. In
literature this is called plagiarism. It is theft just like robbing a
stage-coach.

Describing internet workouts as training is like calling
apples oranges. There is very little science available to the public online. If
one is relatively uneducated there is no frame of reference to discard the bad
information therein. Most of the “peer reviewed” garbage online is anecdotal at
best. Anecdotal evidence is a starting point; it is not supported yet. Science
is supposed to be studied, challenged, and supported or not. If your sample
size is smaller than your shoe size it is not science. If there are no
references it is not science. Gray
![]() |
Not a top level strength anything! |
![]() |
Not a strength guy at all! |
Do not take me the wrong way. I am not one of those internet
guys always looking for scientific support for practice; far from it. I am a
lifter who studies the science done in the former Soviet Union. It is the best
sports science organized yet and it works.
![]() |
Knowledge and experience are synonymous. |
The research is in on strength training. Strength cannot be upgraded
online. All of the internet advocates I have met are online more than they are
lifting. Strength is best improved with barbells. Many argue this point. It is
not arguable. Dumbbells, kettlebells, medicine balls, and any other tools are
accessory work. Accessory work supports strength but does not equate with
absolute strength.
Modern training is more of a warm up than training. I once read something on a CrossFit wall
“your workout is our warm up”. Bold words. If CrossFit people were strong they
would not have as many injuries as statistics show. Appearance based and
accessory work are not
training without strength work. Modern training is not
training because it does not include strength work.
Strength work is the foundation of training. It must
represent a large majority of invested time and energy. Weightlifting and
powerlifting are strength work. If one can perform more than eight repetitions
with a weight it is not strength work. This is accessory work as I have mentioned.
Find a gym, hire an experienced coach, and train. A coach
must have been competitive at some time or another at the level you want to
achieve. Coaches are superior to trainers. Their understanding is greater. They
have done the work you need to do. Everyone, grand-mother or master of sport
international class (MSIC), needs to address strength chiefly. STRENGTH and
conditioning is training.
Get stronger! docsgym@live.com
No comments:
Post a Comment